The Maryland Court of Appeals has agreed to hear an appeal regarding the issue of contingent fee contracts by Montgomery County and several other jurisdictions, which the plaintiff's allege violate state law.
Tuesday, March 27, 2012
Saturday, March 24, 2012
DC Budgets to Increase Camera Revenues by $30million
DC Mayor Vincent Gray has unveiled a new budget which proposes to increase photo enforcement revenues by $30million to help close the city's looming budget gap, according to an article in the Washington Post.
The fines will be a part of a new "traffic calming initiative" which includes not just speed cameras, but also red light cameras which ticket motorists for coming to a full stop slightly past the white line, making right turns, "blocking the box". The city also uses parking ticket cameras attached to street sweepers.
DC has frequently been criticized for using its photo enforcement program as a de-facto commuter tax, largely targeting Maryland and Virginia residents. A recent proposal to lower most speed limits in the city to 15mph was abandoned after it was shouted down by the press. earned approximately $50million in speed and red light camera tickets in FY11 alone.
Mayor Gray's administration has recently been the target of a federal investigation into improper campaign financing.
The fines will be a part of a new "traffic calming initiative" which includes not just speed cameras, but also red light cameras which ticket motorists for coming to a full stop slightly past the white line, making right turns, "blocking the box". The city also uses parking ticket cameras attached to street sweepers.
DC has frequently been criticized for using its photo enforcement program as a de-facto commuter tax, largely targeting Maryland and Virginia residents. A recent proposal to lower most speed limits in the city to 15mph was abandoned after it was shouted down by the press. earned approximately $50million in speed and red light camera tickets in FY11 alone.
Mayor Gray's administration has recently been the target of a federal investigation into improper campaign financing.
Reactions: |
Monday, March 12, 2012
House Committee Given Testimony on Camera Errors, Due Process Violations: Was Anybody Listening?
![]() |
A 40,000lb RV cited by Forest Heights while towing a car |
On Friday March 9 the House Environmental Matters committee heard testimony on several speed camera bills. The bills included House Bill 1044 (which StopBigBrotherMD.org supports), correcting several problems pertaining to testing requirements for speed cameras and due process issues which have been observed with existing speed camera programs. Also included were House Bill 944(aka SB486), which removes the requirement that police review citations and allows private contractors to have the final say in who receives citations (something which StopBigBrotherMD.org strongly opposes), removing a critical safeguard promised to the public when statewide speed cameras were implemented.
Speakers in favor of House Bill 1044 included John Townsend from AAA, as well as a representative from the Maryland Public Interest Research Group (PIRG) which last year wrote a report about the privatization of law enforcement, cautioning on various types of conflicts of interest. Neither AAA nor PIRG oppose speed cameras if they are not used as 'cash cows'. PIRG argued that the legislation added 'necessary public interest protections'. AAA argued that the legislation was necessary 'to protect the integrity of the program', and that what they have observed taking in courtrooms 'was undermining public confidence'.
Four citizens who had received erroneous citations from Optotraffic speed cameras appeared. One, Will Foreman, has been a frequent critic of the accuracy of Optotraffic cameras used by Forest Heights. However at this hearing three other recipients of erroneous tickets, who have no affiliation with Eastover Auto, also presented testimony. This included the owner of another business, who claimed that a car owned by him had been wrongly cited by Forest Heights at 75mph which he stated was not possible under the circumstances. Another ticket recipient, Earl Lomax, a retired police officer, had been cited for speeding by Forest Heights in his 40,000 pound RV only a short distance after he had turned onto MD210, traveling uphill, while towing a car behind it. Lomax had contested his citation, presenting photos of the vehicle and of the area claiming that it would have been physically impossible to reach the recorded speed. However it took Mr. Lomax a year to receive his court hearing, and when he got there he was found him guilty, ruling that he could not contest the recorded speed, and was forced to pay a fine plus court costs. Unfortunately, some courts have denied that any defense against the recorded speed is allowable. HB1044 amends the law to require that a defendant be permitted to use citation images in defense of a violation.
The editor of this StopBigBrotherMD.org also spoke and presented 30 pages of written testimony on HB1044, documenting numerous other examples of speed measurement errors. Included in his written testimony were references to the "false triggers" and erroneous speed measurements which the town of Cheverly had reported before their contract with Optotraffic was terminated. Also included were examples of errors not previously disclosed publicly. One example was an email obtained from the City of New Carrollton sent to their contractor, Optotraffic, which showed that the city of New Carrollton was aware of similar cases in 2010. Included in the email was an image of a 26" rental truck recorded at 68mph which was apparently NOT traveling that speed, as the police had labeled it a "False Camera Trigger". Optotraffic has in the past publicly claimed that nobody has ever shown them proof of errors.
![]() |
New Carrollton "False Trigger", click for a larger view |
State Senate Votes To Keep Workerless Workzone Cameras
After a state senate committee rejected a bill which would have required that "workzone speed monitoring systems" only be used when at least one worker is present, Senator Alan Kittleman brought the issue to the floor by offering an amendment to a separate piece of legislation (Senate Bill 486 -- which allows private contractors rather than police to approve speed camera tickets). The amendment banning workerless workzone cameras failed to pass by one vote.
Reactions: |
Thursday, March 8, 2012
We Can Hardly Believe What They Are Doing Now
FIRST, state lawmakers introduced legislation which would allow private contractors, rather than police, to approve speed camera citation. But now legislation is being considered which would allow an attorney, rather than a judge to hear to hear "nonincarcerable violations of the Maryland Vehicle Law", which would include speed and red light camera cases.
The legislation, House Bill 1030, was sponsored by State Delegate Tiffany Alston(Prince George's County) would require judges in Prince George's County to appoint an attorney called a "Master", to hear cases and decide guilt or innocence The bill further states "IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS SECTION MAY BE FUNDED BY REVENUES RAISED IN PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY FROM SPEED MONITORING SYSTEMS", meaning that the salary of such individuals could be paid out of speed camera revenues. This would give the attorney a financial motive to find people contesting speed camera tickets guilty, or to not reduce fines if there were mitigating circumstances.
The fiscal policy notes for the legislation cite the increasing number of cases which Prince George's County has received from speed and red light camera programs as reason for the bill.
Read about it at TheNewsPaper.com
The legislation, House Bill 1030, was sponsored by State Delegate Tiffany Alston(Prince George's County) would require judges in Prince George's County to appoint an attorney called a "Master", to hear cases and decide guilt or innocence The bill further states "IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS SECTION MAY BE FUNDED BY REVENUES RAISED IN PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY FROM SPEED MONITORING SYSTEMS", meaning that the salary of such individuals could be paid out of speed camera revenues. This would give the attorney a financial motive to find people contesting speed camera tickets guilty, or to not reduce fines if there were mitigating circumstances.
The fiscal policy notes for the legislation cite the increasing number of cases which Prince George's County has received from speed and red light camera programs as reason for the bill.
Read about it at TheNewsPaper.com
Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Baltimore Issues Hundreds of Erroneous Citations
Baltimore City will be forced to refunds or void over a thousand speed camera tickets after WBFF Baltimore News revealed that the cameras had been configured to issue tickets for the wrong speed limit.
Two motorists who received citations from one camera located at 2800 S Hanover Street Northbound, Near the Harbor Street Bridget citing them for driving more than 12mph over the speed limit in a 30mph Zone. While most motorists who received the citations paid them without question, these two realized the posed speed limit on Hanover Street was in fact 35mph, not 30mph, and in fact the tickets were in error. One of the motorists took a video of the stretch of road, showing 35mph speed limit signs both before and after the speed camera location, not 30mph which the citations were based on.
Both motorists contacted WBFF news about their tickets. After a reporter confronted the city with the errors, the city admitted that 998 motorists were wrongly cited.
WBFF also REPORTED that a SECOND camera, located at 5400 The Alameda, was ALSO incorrectly configured to the wrong speed limit. 190 motorists were incorrectly tickets by that camera.
Baltimore has since agreed to issue refunds.
A representative of Baltimore City claimed that they have "three tiers of checks in place to prevent this from happening", and that errors are relatively rare.
The erroneous citations from these cameras had apparently slipped through the 'three tiers of checks' since January.
Baltimore City made a similar error in the past, where in 2010 a camera located at 2200 West Cold Spring Lane issued 932 tickets in error, after being set to enforce the wrong speed limit. Baltimore recently was discovered to have issued a tickets to a motorist who had been deceased for years. In another instance one motorst took seven months to clear a citation from his record which Baltimore City issued to the wrong car by mistake. In a separate incident, Baltimore City was discovered to have issued 2000 red light camera citations which had been "signed" by a police officer who had been dead for months.
Baltimore City is one of the jurisdictions who testified in favor of legislation which would remove the requirement that speed camera citations be reviewed by police, allowing private contractors to "sign off" on them instead. Baltimore is also seeking legislation which would authorize an entirely new type of photo enforcement system, which would issue fines of up to $500 to large vehicles. Both bills were approved by a legislative committee last week and are expected to be voted on in state senate soon.
On the other hand, another bill would require cameras to meet national standards for accuracy and certification instead, is scheduled to be heard by a house committee this week. StopBigBrotherMD had previously learned that as of early 2010 some cameras in Baltimore did not meet a requirement that they be "certified" by an "independent calibration laboratory", and were instead merely "certified" by the manufacturer of the device. The proposed bill, which some municipalities who use inaccurate cameras are likely to oppose, would ban this.
Two motorists who received citations from one camera located at 2800 S Hanover Street Northbound, Near the Harbor Street Bridget citing them for driving more than 12mph over the speed limit in a 30mph Zone. While most motorists who received the citations paid them without question, these two realized the posed speed limit on Hanover Street was in fact 35mph, not 30mph, and in fact the tickets were in error. One of the motorists took a video of the stretch of road, showing 35mph speed limit signs both before and after the speed camera location, not 30mph which the citations were based on.
Both motorists contacted WBFF news about their tickets. After a reporter confronted the city with the errors, the city admitted that 998 motorists were wrongly cited.
WBFF also REPORTED that a SECOND camera, located at 5400 The Alameda, was ALSO incorrectly configured to the wrong speed limit. 190 motorists were incorrectly tickets by that camera.
Baltimore has since agreed to issue refunds.
A representative of Baltimore City claimed that they have "three tiers of checks in place to prevent this from happening", and that errors are relatively rare.
The erroneous citations from these cameras had apparently slipped through the 'three tiers of checks' since January.
Baltimore City made a similar error in the past, where in 2010 a camera located at 2200 West Cold Spring Lane issued 932 tickets in error, after being set to enforce the wrong speed limit. Baltimore recently was discovered to have issued a tickets to a motorist who had been deceased for years. In another instance one motorst took seven months to clear a citation from his record which Baltimore City issued to the wrong car by mistake. In a separate incident, Baltimore City was discovered to have issued 2000 red light camera citations which had been "signed" by a police officer who had been dead for months.
Baltimore City is one of the jurisdictions who testified in favor of legislation which would remove the requirement that speed camera citations be reviewed by police, allowing private contractors to "sign off" on them instead. Baltimore is also seeking legislation which would authorize an entirely new type of photo enforcement system, which would issue fines of up to $500 to large vehicles. Both bills were approved by a legislative committee last week and are expected to be voted on in state senate soon.
On the other hand, another bill would require cameras to meet national standards for accuracy and certification instead, is scheduled to be heard by a house committee this week. StopBigBrotherMD had previously learned that as of early 2010 some cameras in Baltimore did not meet a requirement that they be "certified" by an "independent calibration laboratory", and were instead merely "certified" by the manufacturer of the device. The proposed bill, which some municipalities who use inaccurate cameras are likely to oppose, would ban this.
Reactions: |
Monday, March 5, 2012
Delegate Wants to Exempt Cops from Camera Tickets
Delegate Frank Conaway (D, Baltimore City) has sponsored two bills which if passed would exempt "emergency vehicles" (House Bill 848) and law enforcement vehicles (House Bill 857) from receiving either speed or red light camera citations, making no distinction as to whether the vehicles were responding to calls or emergencies.
Reactions: |
Saturday, March 3, 2012
Legislative Committees Approve of Removing Police Oversight, Moving Cameras For Revenue Purposes
The powers that be in Annapolis sick of people whining about speed camera tickets and listening to stories about people getting bogus tickets, and have decided to respond by lifting any pretext that speed cameras are about anything but making money. So this week two state legislative committees approved a bill which removes the requirement that police review citations before they are issued, while voting down a second bill which would have banned speed cameras from being moved specifically for the purpose of increasing revenue.
Reactions: |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
►
2019
(3)
- ► November 2019 (1)
- ► August 2019 (1)
- ► February 2019 (1)
-
►
2018
(10)
- ► December 2018 (1)
- ► October 2018 (1)
- ► August 2018 (1)
- ► April 2018 (1)
- ► February 2018 (4)
- ► January 2018 (2)
-
►
2017
(20)
- ► December 2017 (1)
- ► September 2017 (2)
- ► August 2017 (4)
- ► March 2017 (2)
- ► February 2017 (5)
- ► January 2017 (5)
-
►
2016
(21)
- ► December 2016 (4)
- ► November 2016 (3)
- ► October 2016 (1)
- ► April 2016 (2)
- ► March 2016 (2)
- ► February 2016 (4)
- ► January 2016 (3)
-
►
2015
(39)
- ► December 2015 (2)
- ► October 2015 (1)
- ► September 2015 (5)
- ► August 2015 (3)
- ► April 2015 (1)
- ► March 2015 (5)
- ► February 2015 (5)
- ► January 2015 (5)
-
►
2014
(82)
- ► December 2014 (4)
- ► November 2014 (3)
- ► October 2014 (3)
- ► September 2014 (9)
- ► August 2014 (6)
- ► April 2014 (4)
- ► March 2014 (10)
- ► February 2014 (14)
- ► January 2014 (12)
-
►
2013
(102)
- ► December 2013 (11)
- ► November 2013 (10)
- ► October 2013 (9)
- ► September 2013 (5)
- ► August 2013 (7)
- ► April 2013 (7)
- ► March 2013 (14)
- ► February 2013 (6)
- ► January 2013 (8)
-
▼
2012
(66)
- ► December 2012 (6)
- ► November 2012 (4)
- ► October 2012 (9)
- ► September 2012 (8)
- ► August 2012 (8)
- ► April 2012 (2)
-
▼
March 2012
(8)
- Maryland High Court to Hear Speed Camera Case
- DC Budgets to Increase Camera Revenues by $30million
- House Committee Given Testimony on Camera Errors, ...
- State Senate Votes To Keep Workerless Workzone Cam...
- We Can Hardly Believe What They Are Doing Now
- Baltimore Issues Hundreds of Erroneous Citations
- Delegate Wants to Exempt Cops from Camera Tickets
- Legislative Committees Approve of Removing Police ...
- ► February 2012 (7)
- ► January 2012 (7)
-
►
2011
(88)
- ► December 2011 (3)
- ► November 2011 (4)
- ► October 2011 (7)
- ► September 2011 (5)
- ► August 2011 (7)
- ► April 2011 (6)
- ► March 2011 (9)
- ► February 2011 (10)
- ► January 2011 (10)
-
►
2010
(69)
- ► December 2010 (6)
- ► November 2010 (4)
- ► October 2010 (10)
- ► September 2010 (9)
- ► August 2010 (4)
- ► April 2010 (4)
- ► March 2010 (6)
- ► February 2010 (4)
- ► January 2010 (6)
-
►
2009
(58)
- ► December 2009 (4)
- ► November 2009 (6)
- ► October 2009 (9)
- ► September 2009 (6)
- ► August 2009 (1)
- ► April 2009 (5)
- ► March 2009 (6)
- ► February 2009 (6)
- ► January 2009 (7)
-
►
2008
(17)
- ► December 2008 (4)
- ► November 2008 (4)
- ► October 2008 (1)
- ► September 2008 (1)
- ► August 2008 (2)
- ► March 2008 (2)

Our Top Stories
- Rockville Falsely Accuses School Bus of Speeding
- Montgomery County Has Secret Speed Camera Committee -- Press and Critics Not Welcome
- Montgomery Speed Camera "OmBudsman" Won't Answer Questions
- Montgomery County Issues Erroneous Tickets
- College Park Cited Stationary Bus for Speeding
- Montgomery County ATEU Defends Culture of Secrecy
- How Two-Faced Triple-A Gave Maryland Speed Cameras
- "Secret" Baltimore Speed Camera Audit Found 10% Error Rate
- Speed Camera Reform Act Just a Big Fat Lie
- Court Rules Against Morningside on Public Records Access
- Speed Camera Company Celebrates "Bounty System" Loophole
- Montgomery County Steals Lanes for Expensive Bus Program
- Wicomico County Teachers Say Camera is Not Accurate
- Montgomery Council President Rice Racked Up Tickets
- Circuit Court Rules Innocence is a Defense, Rejects "Snitch" Requirement
- Baltimore Ends Camera Contract, Moves to Hides Records
- Montgomery Scamera Boss Lies About Red Light Camera "Warning Flashes"
- Montgomery County Camera Boss Blocks Public From Secret Meeting
- Salisbury Records Show Calibration Lapses, Sorry No Refunds!!
- Speed Camera Accuracy Questioned in Morningside
- Attorny General Gansler Depicted as "Reckless Passenger"
- Morningside Deployed Cameras Despite County Denial
- Morningside Admits Maintaining No Calibration Records, Doesn't Operate Own Cameras
- ACLU Documents Mass Tracking of Motorists By License Plate Scannrs
- Brekford Demands Tribute to See Calibration Records
- Access To Brekford Calibration Records Stalled in Salisbury, Morningside
- Public and Private Lobbyists Worked to Kill Speed Camera Reform
- Montgomery County Speed Camera Transforms Toyota into Dodge
- Montgomery County Boasts Error Rate "Under Ten Percent"
- Speed Camera Company Collects Dirt on Competitors
- Woman Gets 3 Tickets from DC Without Going There
- Legislature Raises Gas Tax
- Laurel, Hagerstown Circumvent Calibration Requirement
- Speed Camera Calibration Fails To Ensure Accuracy
- Speed Camera Programs Flout Sunshine Law
- Xerox Admits 5% Error Rate For Speed Camera Tickets
- Baltimore Cites Motionless Car For Speeding
- O'Malley Says Speed Camera Bounties Are Illegal
- Baltimore Ticketed Innocent Delivery Vehicle: Documents Prove Speed Camera Error
- Rockville Sees Huge Surge in Red Light Violations
- Trucking Company Challenges Accuracy of Baltimore Citations: Videos Prove Speed Camera Errors
- Speed Camera Salesman Caught Speeding AGAIN
- Riverdale Park Defends Forgery of Police Signatures
- High Court Rules Local Governments Above the Law
- Riverdale Park Allowed Civilians to Forge Police Approvals
- Baltimore Speed Camera Issues Ticket to the Dead
- Statewide Speed Cameras Now a $77Million Per Year Industry
- PG County Court Presumes All Defendants Guilty
- Town Releases Documents Proving Errors With Optotraffic Cameras
- Man arrested for asserting innocence in speed camera hearing
- Optotraffic Representative Caught Speeding
- Driver Uses Carchip to Challenge Optotraffic Camera
- Deceased Baltimore Cop Signs 2000 Citations
- Montgomery County Denies Right To Face Camera Operator In Court
- ACS Buys Steak Dinners For Lawmakers
- Baltimore City Issues Hundreds of Tickets in Error
- Baltimore Writes Speed Camera Revenues Into Budget Before Cameras Approved
- Camera Mistakenly Accuses Driver of 100mph Rampage
- Montgomery County Scamera Contract Includes Massive PR Campaign
- Optotraffic Investigates Possible Speed Camera Errors
- Speed Camera Legislation Attracts Lobbyists
- Sykesville Voters Overturn Speed Cameras in Referendum
- Traffic Engineering Techniques Out-perform Speed Cameras
- Transportation Planning Board Unveils Plan to Track and Tax Drivers
