Near the end of the general assembly, an "emergency bill" was introduced which would allow counties and cities to impose late fees for red light and speed camera citations to people who pay a fine after the deadline on the citation. Senate Bill 1101 was introduced by State Senator Victor Ramirez on 3/29, and was referred on the Judicial Proceedings Committee on April 6th. The bill applies to red light and speed camera tickets as well as parking tickets.
Most jurisdictions CURRENTLY charge late fees for citations, EVEN THOUGH THERE IS NO EXPLICIT AUTHORIZATION FOR SUCH FEES IN STATE LAW. The fiscal policy notes for the bill states "On March 21, 2012, the Chief Judge of the District Court issued a letter advising local governments that, despite current references in the District Court Uniform Speed Monitoring Citation to local administrative, flagging, and/or late fees, such fees likely violate the requirement in Article IV, Section 41A of the Maryland Constitution that the District Court be uniform throughout the State. The District Court had allowed a local government to charge administrative, flagging, and/or late fees for fines generated by traffic control signal monitoring systems if the jurisdiction had submitted a copy of a local ordinance authorizing such fees. The letter indicates that 31 jurisdictions authorize such fees. However, this practice was determined to likely be in violation of the uniformity requirement of the Maryland Constitution, and the District Court will revise the Uniform Speed Monitoring Citation to eliminate any reference to the local authorization."
In other words, numerous jurisdictions have been illegally, and unconstitutionally, imposing late fees which they are not authorized to under state law... for years.
The bill was introduced as "emergency legislation" after the normal due date because of the possible impact to revenue collected as late fees by jurisdictions if it does not pass. "Because the bill is generally consistent with long-standing practice, it is not anticipated to materially affect local government finances. However, local government revenues decrease, potentially significantly beginning in FY 2012, if the bill is not enacted and the District Court’s recent interpretation of current law is enforced."
"to the extent late fees have been a significant revenue source for jurisdictions, the bill allows for their continued collection. For example, Baltimore City advises that in fiscal 2011 it received $1.5 million in flagging fees from late payments on traffic control signal and speed monitoring system fines."
The collection of revenues from expected late fees has been written into the budgets of other jurisdictions as well. Montgomery County, for example reportedly budgeted to collect $1.1million worth of late fees in FY2010.
The legislation does not spell out the amount of the fee, or how long an individual would be allowed to pay. This website has seen many examples of citations issued by some jurisdictions with due date was set only two or three weeks after the date the citation was mailed, thus opening the possibility that a person might not receive a citation until after the due date if for example they were out of town. According to an article in the Gazette, late fees are in some cases considered part of the revenue collected by the program of which the vendor collects a 40% cut. This gives the contractor who mails the citations, manages the customer service line, and collects payments, receives a financial incentive to make it more likely that people will pay citations late in order to increase their revenue... for example by mailing citations at the latest possible date or setting the shortest possible period of time to pay.
The deadline to contest a citation in normally set earlier than the deadline to pay the fine. As such any individual who does not receive a citation until after the due date, for whatever reason, would normally be told by the speed camera program's customer service line (run by the private contractor getting a cut of the revenue) that they can no longer contest the fine, or the late fee, in court.
- ► 2016 (21)
- ► 2015 (39)
- ► 2014 (82)
- ► 2013 (102)
- ▼ April 2012 (2)
- ► 2011 (88)
- ► 2010 (69)
- ► 2009 (58)
Our Top Stories
- Rockville Falsely Accuses School Bus of Speeding
- Montgomery County Has Secret Speed Camera Committee -- Press and Critics Not Welcome
- Montgomery Speed Camera "OmBudsman" Won't Answer Questions
- Montgomery County Issues Erroneous Tickets
- College Park Cited Stationary Bus for Speeding
- Montgomery County ATEU Defends Culture of Secrecy
- How Two-Faced Triple-A Gave Maryland Speed Cameras
- "Secret" Baltimore Speed Camera Audit Found 10% Error Rate
- Speed Camera Reform Act Just a Big Fat Lie
- Court Rules Against Morningside on Public Records Access
- Speed Camera Company Celebrates "Bounty System" Loophole
- Montgomery County Steals Lanes for Expensive Bus Program
- Wicomico County Teachers Say Camera is Not Accurate
- Montgomery Council President Rice Racked Up Tickets
- Circuit Court Rules Innocence is a Defense, Rejects "Snitch" Requirement
- Baltimore Ends Camera Contract, Moves to Hides Records
- Montgomery Scamera Boss Lies About Red Light Camera "Warning Flashes"
- Montgomery County Camera Boss Blocks Public From Secret Meeting
- Salisbury Records Show Calibration Lapses, Sorry No Refunds!!
- Speed Camera Accuracy Questioned in Morningside
- Attorny General Gansler Depicted as "Reckless Passenger"
- Morningside Deployed Cameras Despite County Denial
- Morningside Admits Maintaining No Calibration Records, Doesn't Operate Own Cameras
- ACLU Documents Mass Tracking of Motorists By License Plate Scannrs
- Brekford Demands Tribute to See Calibration Records
- Access To Brekford Calibration Records Stalled in Salisbury, Morningside
- Public and Private Lobbyists Worked to Kill Speed Camera Reform
- Montgomery County Speed Camera Transforms Toyota into Dodge
- Montgomery County Boasts Error Rate "Under Ten Percent"
- Speed Camera Company Collects Dirt on Competitors
- Woman Gets 3 Tickets from DC Without Going There
- Legislature Raises Gas Tax
- Laurel, Hagerstown Circumvent Calibration Requirement
- Speed Camera Calibration Fails To Ensure Accuracy
- Speed Camera Programs Flout Sunshine Law
- Xerox Admits 5% Error Rate For Speed Camera Tickets
- Baltimore Cites Motionless Car For Speeding
- O'Malley Says Speed Camera Bounties Are Illegal
- Baltimore Ticketed Innocent Delivery Vehicle: Documents Prove Speed Camera Error
- Rockville Sees Huge Surge in Red Light Violations
- Trucking Company Challenges Accuracy of Baltimore Citations: Videos Prove Speed Camera Errors
- Speed Camera Salesman Caught Speeding AGAIN
- Riverdale Park Defends Forgery of Police Signatures
- High Court Rules Local Governments Above the Law
- Riverdale Park Allowed Civilians to Forge Police Approvals
- Baltimore Speed Camera Issues Ticket to the Dead
- Statewide Speed Cameras Now a $77Million Per Year Industry
- PG County Court Presumes All Defendants Guilty
- Town Releases Documents Proving Errors With Optotraffic Cameras
- Man arrested for asserting innocence in speed camera hearing
- Optotraffic Representative Caught Speeding
- Driver Uses Carchip to Challenge Optotraffic Camera
- Deceased Baltimore Cop Signs 2000 Citations
- Montgomery County Denies Right To Face Camera Operator In Court
- ACS Buys Steak Dinners For Lawmakers
- Baltimore City Issues Hundreds of Tickets in Error
- Baltimore Writes Speed Camera Revenues Into Budget Before Cameras Approved
- Camera Mistakenly Accuses Driver of 100mph Rampage
- Montgomery County Scamera Contract Includes Massive PR Campaign
- Optotraffic Investigates Possible Speed Camera Errors
- Speed Camera Legislation Attracts Lobbyists
- Sykesville Voters Overturn Speed Cameras in Referendum
- Traffic Engineering Techniques Out-perform Speed Cameras
- Transportation Planning Board Unveils Plan to Track and Tax Drivers