A hearing is set for six speed camera related bills in the Maryland House Environmental Matters Committee in Annapolis on March 5th starting at 1pm.
These bills were largely prompted by revelations that Baltimore City and speed camera contractor Xerox Corp had systematically issued erroneous speed camera tickets to hundreds innocent motorists, and that the error producing camera was left in operation for many months after the city and Xerox were aware of the problems, as proven by emails from March 2012 and July 2012. The legislation was also prompted by an audit of the SHA's speed camera program which documented improprieties in the procurement of their speed camera contract and the testing and certification of equipment.
The bills to be heard are:House Bill 421: A speed camera reform bill which requires speed camera citation images to provide secondary evidence of speed. The bill would also eliminate "per ticket bounty" contracts (ie "contingent fee contracts) which are now common throughout the state despite an existing provision of law which was supposed to ban such deals (according to a statement by Governor O'Malley himself). And it would require a speed camera contractor to be fined $1000 for each erroneous citation issued. (See our previous coverage).
Cameras in Baltimore City produced erroneous speed reading even
though they passed all calibration tests even on the very same day one of
them ticketed a completely motionless car).... proving that claims that equipment is 'calibrated and tested daily' are utterly meaningless in terms of
ensuring accuracy. The same types of cameras which produced those errors are
currently being used in Baltimore County and the City of Rockville, and the same contractor which previously ran these cameras also run's speed camera programs for the SHA and Montgomery County. A bill with some similar provisions was recently heard by a Senate Committee, where employees of speed camera programs argued that motorists should not be permitted access to secondary evidence of speed because "the courts could be swamped" by people contesting tickets (In other words: the government should be allowed to implement a policy designed to deter people from contesting tickets by ensuring that it is hopeless because people are presumed guilty).
House Bill 166 : Would require speed cameras to capture a video clip of the alleged violation and make this available to defendants. (See our previous coverage) The presence of video clips taken by Baltimore City's cameras was what first revealed the errors in Baltimore City's Program, and it is what prompted the Baltimore Sun's investigation into errors by Baltimore City speed cameras and eventually forced Xerox corp to admit the systematic errors by their cameras. This bill will likely be opposed by speed camera programs and contractors who will claim this will require them to change to different hardware, ***but who in reality are concerned about errors being revealed within their own programs***.
House Bill 251 : A bill to repeal speed cameras all together. (See our previous coverage)
House Bill 435 : A bill which would award a defendant $40 should a court rule in their favor. (See our previous coverage)
House Bill 929: A bill which makes modest alterations to signage and citation review requirements for speed cameras.
House Bill 1094 : A bill sponsored by delegates Frank Conaway and Curt Anderson which would award a defendant $250 should a court rule in their favor. This is similar to HB 435.
Despite much talk about speed camera reform legislation in the press, any reform bills will likely face a difficult uphill battle merely to make it through this committee in tact. Last year the Environmental Matters Committee, chaired by Delegate Maggie McIntosh(D, Baltimore City), heard testimony on a credible reform bill (House Bill 1044). That 2012 bill was prompted by apparent speed camera errors in various towns including Forest Heights, College Park, Brentwood, and a disclosure by the Town of Cheverly that Optotraffic technology had produced "false triggers". (Read our coverage of last year's testimony and the extensive evidence of errors presented to the committee one year ago.) The House committee took no action and rejected the bill without even a vote. A promised "interim study" on the subject was never conducted.
Committee hearings on these bills begin at 1pm. You can contact the members of the Environmental Matters Committee here.
Environmental Matters Committee Members:
Please contact us at StopBigBrotherMD@gmail.com if you plan to attend the hearing.
Those who profit from speed cameras are throwing VAST resources (including some resources paid for out of your tax dollars) into blocking any meaningful reform of the state's speed camera law and to protect their right to continue breaking promises which were made to the public. YOU are the only resource which can counter that. It is up to you whether you will speak up now while you have the opportunity, or whether you will blindly 'just pay the fine' like good little sheeple.
- ► 2016 (21)
- ► 2015 (39)
- ► 2014 (82)
- Maryland Legislature Votes To Raise Gas Tax
- PA Examines Speed Cameras, Looks to Maryland As Ex...
- Senate Neuters Speed Camera Reform Bill Provision
- Maryland House Approves Gas Tax Hike
- Baltmore City Calibration Certificates May be Inco...
- Baltimore Calls for "Media Restraints"
- Speed Camera Reform Clears Senate Committee
- Laurel, Hagerstown Circumvent Calibration Requirem...
- Gas Tax Hike Included In Govenor's Transportation ...
- House, Senate Committees Prepare to Rule on Speed ...
- Lawmaker Proposes SHA Ticket Refunds
- Ohio Court Rebukes Optotraffic
- Court Rules Baltimore County Contract Illegal
- House Committee to Examine Six Speed Camera Bills
- ▼ March 2013 (14)
- ► 2012 (66)
- ► 2011 (88)
- ► 2010 (69)
- ► 2009 (58)
Our Top Stories
- Rockville Falsely Accuses School Bus of Speeding
- Montgomery County Has Secret Speed Camera Committee -- Press and Critics Not Welcome
- Montgomery Speed Camera "OmBudsman" Won't Answer Questions
- Montgomery County Issues Erroneous Tickets
- College Park Cited Stationary Bus for Speeding
- Montgomery County ATEU Defends Culture of Secrecy
- How Two-Faced Triple-A Gave Maryland Speed Cameras
- "Secret" Baltimore Speed Camera Audit Found 10% Error Rate
- Speed Camera Reform Act Just a Big Fat Lie
- Court Rules Against Morningside on Public Records Access
- Speed Camera Company Celebrates "Bounty System" Loophole
- Montgomery County Steals Lanes for Expensive Bus Program
- Wicomico County Teachers Say Camera is Not Accurate
- Montgomery Council President Rice Racked Up Tickets
- Circuit Court Rules Innocence is a Defense, Rejects "Snitch" Requirement
- Baltimore Ends Camera Contract, Moves to Hides Records
- Montgomery Scamera Boss Lies About Red Light Camera "Warning Flashes"
- Montgomery County Camera Boss Blocks Public From Secret Meeting
- Salisbury Records Show Calibration Lapses, Sorry No Refunds!!
- Speed Camera Accuracy Questioned in Morningside
- Attorny General Gansler Depicted as "Reckless Passenger"
- Morningside Deployed Cameras Despite County Denial
- Morningside Admits Maintaining No Calibration Records, Doesn't Operate Own Cameras
- ACLU Documents Mass Tracking of Motorists By License Plate Scannrs
- Brekford Demands Tribute to See Calibration Records
- Access To Brekford Calibration Records Stalled in Salisbury, Morningside
- Public and Private Lobbyists Worked to Kill Speed Camera Reform
- Montgomery County Speed Camera Transforms Toyota into Dodge
- Montgomery County Boasts Error Rate "Under Ten Percent"
- Speed Camera Company Collects Dirt on Competitors
- Woman Gets 3 Tickets from DC Without Going There
- Legislature Raises Gas Tax
- Laurel, Hagerstown Circumvent Calibration Requirement
- Speed Camera Calibration Fails To Ensure Accuracy
- Speed Camera Programs Flout Sunshine Law
- Xerox Admits 5% Error Rate For Speed Camera Tickets
- Baltimore Cites Motionless Car For Speeding
- O'Malley Says Speed Camera Bounties Are Illegal
- Baltimore Ticketed Innocent Delivery Vehicle: Documents Prove Speed Camera Error
- Rockville Sees Huge Surge in Red Light Violations
- Trucking Company Challenges Accuracy of Baltimore Citations: Videos Prove Speed Camera Errors
- Speed Camera Salesman Caught Speeding AGAIN
- Riverdale Park Defends Forgery of Police Signatures
- High Court Rules Local Governments Above the Law
- Riverdale Park Allowed Civilians to Forge Police Approvals
- Baltimore Speed Camera Issues Ticket to the Dead
- Statewide Speed Cameras Now a $77Million Per Year Industry
- PG County Court Presumes All Defendants Guilty
- Town Releases Documents Proving Errors With Optotraffic Cameras
- Man arrested for asserting innocence in speed camera hearing
- Optotraffic Representative Caught Speeding
- Driver Uses Carchip to Challenge Optotraffic Camera
- Deceased Baltimore Cop Signs 2000 Citations
- Montgomery County Denies Right To Face Camera Operator In Court
- ACS Buys Steak Dinners For Lawmakers
- Baltimore City Issues Hundreds of Tickets in Error
- Baltimore Writes Speed Camera Revenues Into Budget Before Cameras Approved
- Camera Mistakenly Accuses Driver of 100mph Rampage
- Montgomery County Scamera Contract Includes Massive PR Campaign
- Optotraffic Investigates Possible Speed Camera Errors
- Speed Camera Legislation Attracts Lobbyists
- Sykesville Voters Overturn Speed Cameras in Referendum
- Traffic Engineering Techniques Out-perform Speed Cameras
- Transportation Planning Board Unveils Plan to Track and Tax Drivers