The Maryland House Environmental Matters and Senate Judicial Proceedings Committees are still pondering legislation to reform or repeal the state's speed camera law. However as time passes, prospects are dimming that meaningful reform will be passed this session.
These bills were largely prompted by revelations that Baltimore City and speed camera contractor Xerox Corp had systematically issued erroneous speed camera tickets to hundreds of innocent motorists,
and that the error producing camera was left in operation for many
months after the city and Xerox were aware of the problems, as proven by
emails from March 2012 and July 2012. The same types of cameras which issued these erroneous citations are also used in Baltimore County and Rockville, and the same contractor runs speed camera programs under Montgomery County, Bowie, Frederick, and the SHA. The legislation was also prompted by an audit of the SHA's speed camera program
which documented improprieties in the procurement of their speed camera
contract and the testing and certification of equipment.
In the senate, a bill sponsored by Senator Pipkin to repeal speed cameras (SB785) is being considered, along with a credible reform bill (SB207) sponsored by Senator Brochin(D, Baltimore County). We presented testimony in support of these two bills on February 20.
In the House, credible repeal legislation (HB421) sponsored by Delegate John Cardin, and a repeal bill (HB 251) is being sponsored by Delegate Michael Smigiel. The Maryland Drivers Alliance presented testimony in support of these two bills and supporting three other reform measures.
SB207 and HB 421 both contain the two key elements which any credible reform legislation MUST have:
1) ending the bounty system (ie paying contractors based on the number of tickets issued) once and for all
2) requiring that speed camera images provide "secondary evidence of speed"
However it appears that the House Committee may be posed to reject all of the credible reform bills, and instead pass House Bill 929, sponsored by committee Vice Chair James Malone. A press release by Delegate Cardin stating that he believes this is the only speed camera bill the committee is prepared to pass.
The problem is that as originally written House Bill 959 IS NOT a speed camera reform bill. The bill merely makes minor cosmetic tweeks to the wording of a few requirements. Some of these changes might possibly make things ever so slightly better or worse, but none of which would have a significant impact on how speed
cameras are run or the level of justice people receive. HB929, as
originally worded, does nothing to address the problems uncovered in
Baltimore City. It does nothing to address the issues raised in the recent audit of the SafeZones Program. And it does nothing to address the extensive problems that we
have uncovered elsewhere in the state over the past five years. T
he Maryland Drivers Alliance has spent a long time considering all the effects of the various speed camera bills in play this year. And we believe passing HB929 in its current form would have only one practical effect: To provide a smoke-screen to deceive the public into thinking lawmakers did something to address the issues recently uncovered in Baltimore when in fact they did nothing. Of course it is still possible that some of the key provisions of reform could be added to HB929 as amendments. However trying to pass off legislation which does not contain the two key provisions of ending the bounty system and requiring secondary evidence of speed as "reform" of the system would be an act of FRAUD against the driving public.
Regarding the matter of the Bounty System, delegate Cardin wrote "Bounty programs undermine public confidence by creating a perverse incentive to issue citations whether warranted or not. Instead, we should be sure that a contractor’s fee is not contingent on the number of citations issued or paid." Indeed it is the position of the Maryland Drivers Alliance that Baltimore's former speed camera contractor was motivated to keep faulty equipment in the field months after they knew it was producing errors by their contingent fee contract.
Had there been no secondary evidence of speed with Baltimore City's camera program,
the city would have gone right on issuing erroneous citations to innocent
motorists. The press would have been none the wiser, and the city and
Xerox Corp would have denied all errors. And we know that there are in
fact many speed camera programs in the state which deny the use of speed
camera photos as evidence of speed (just as Optotraffic and Forest Heights denied citation images could be used as proof of speed AFTER
people started presenting proof of errors). Some speed
camera programs DELIBERATELY round off image timestamps (including the
SafeZones program) thereby ensuring that images cannot be used to verify
With the pathetically weak certification and testing requirements under Maryland law, it is inevitable that
motorists elsewhere in the state will be falsely accused. Without
secondary evidence of speed, there is no way to distinguish between
actual violations and "false triggers". Based on what happened in
Baltimore City there is now no question that speed cameras can produce errors EVEN WHEN ALL CALIBRATION TESTS HAVE PASSED. And documents released by Cheverly revealing camera errors prove that other types of
cameras (run by speed camera contractor Optotraffic) have produced "false triggers" as well.
Such a situation is particularly bad for professional drivers, who could be fired over speed camera tickets. We have been contacted several times in the past about bus drivers who were fired over camera tickets.
Secondary evidence of speed is spelled out in radar performance specifications written by the NHTSA: “If the ATR device is to be considered for unattended operation, the manufacturer shall provide a secondary method for verifying that the evidential recorded image properly identifies the target vehicle and reflects this vehicle’s true speed, as described in §5.18.2. This may be accomplished by means of a second, appropriately delayed image showing the target vehicle crossing a specified reference line." So if the legislature rejects secondary evidence of speed, they will be rejecting the application of national standards.
If lawmakers reject the idea of requiring citation images to
provide "secondary evidence of speed, it will have rejected true reform If
state lawmakers reject true reform, they will have embraced the idea
that falsely accused motorists should be required to "suck it up and
pay", since there will be no evidence which can clear them. If the requirement for secondary evidence of speed is rejected we believe the motive behind it will be obvious : They
are afraid systematic errors will be uncovered in other speed camera programs if
motorists have access to this kind of potentially exonerating evidence. Opponents of secondary evidence want to conceal potentially exonerating evidence from defendants and let them all be presumed guilty.
In so doing
they will have proven the case as to why speed cameras should be
Motorists who want their legal rights protected should contact the members of the house and senate committees NOW. Not someone else, not sometime later. You. Now. Tell them that if they will not pass Delegate Cardin's bill (HB421) or Delegate Brochin's Bill (SB207), then the state speed camera law should be REPEALED.
Environmental Matters Committee Members:
Judicial Proceedings Members
In addition, motorists who care about their legal rights should be aware that AAA Mid Atlantic Supported statewide speed cameras in 2009 and testified in opposition to speed camera repeal legislation this year. While AAA testified in support of reform legislation on March 5, they also chose to stand against the motorists who came on their own behalf to speak in favor of repeal, and instead chose to side with representatives of the corrupt speed camera program of Forest Heights (these were the only two organizations to testify against repeal bill HB251 on March 5, and no private citizens came to testify against it on their own behalf). Contact AAA Mid Atlantic and inform them that: Any Organization which truly speaks for Motorists must support the repeal of speed cameras if Maryland Lawmakers do not pass REAL speed camera reform this year. If Maryland lawmakers do not pass real, substantial reform this year and AAA still supports cameras, then AAA will have proven it does not support speed cameras "if they are done right" but in fact "even if they are done wrong". If that is case, "Insurance Company AAA" will have forever abandoned its credentials as "Motorist Organization AAA". This issue is NOT a "bargaining chip"!
- ► 2016 (21)
- ► 2015 (39)
- ► 2014 (82)
- Maryland Legislature Votes To Raise Gas Tax
- PA Examines Speed Cameras, Looks to Maryland As Ex...
- Senate Neuters Speed Camera Reform Bill Provision
- Maryland House Approves Gas Tax Hike
- Baltmore City Calibration Certificates May be Inco...
- Baltimore Calls for "Media Restraints"
- Speed Camera Reform Clears Senate Committee
- Laurel, Hagerstown Circumvent Calibration Requirem...
- Gas Tax Hike Included In Govenor's Transportation ...
- House, Senate Committees Prepare to Rule on Speed ...
- Lawmaker Proposes SHA Ticket Refunds
- Ohio Court Rebukes Optotraffic
- Court Rules Baltimore County Contract Illegal
- House Committee to Examine Six Speed Camera Bills
- ▼ March 2013 (14)
- ► 2012 (66)
- ► 2011 (88)
- ► 2010 (69)
- ► 2009 (58)
Our Top Stories
- Rockville Falsely Accuses School Bus of Speeding
- Montgomery County Has Secret Speed Camera Committee -- Press and Critics Not Welcome
- Montgomery Speed Camera "OmBudsman" Won't Answer Questions
- Montgomery County Issues Erroneous Tickets
- College Park Cited Stationary Bus for Speeding
- Montgomery County ATEU Defends Culture of Secrecy
- How Two-Faced Triple-A Gave Maryland Speed Cameras
- "Secret" Baltimore Speed Camera Audit Found 10% Error Rate
- Speed Camera Reform Act Just a Big Fat Lie
- Court Rules Against Morningside on Public Records Access
- Speed Camera Company Celebrates "Bounty System" Loophole
- Montgomery County Steals Lanes for Expensive Bus Program
- Wicomico County Teachers Say Camera is Not Accurate
- Montgomery Council President Rice Racked Up Tickets
- Circuit Court Rules Innocence is a Defense, Rejects "Snitch" Requirement
- Baltimore Ends Camera Contract, Moves to Hides Records
- Montgomery Scamera Boss Lies About Red Light Camera "Warning Flashes"
- Montgomery County Camera Boss Blocks Public From Secret Meeting
- Salisbury Records Show Calibration Lapses, Sorry No Refunds!!
- Speed Camera Accuracy Questioned in Morningside
- Attorny General Gansler Depicted as "Reckless Passenger"
- Morningside Deployed Cameras Despite County Denial
- Morningside Admits Maintaining No Calibration Records, Doesn't Operate Own Cameras
- ACLU Documents Mass Tracking of Motorists By License Plate Scannrs
- Brekford Demands Tribute to See Calibration Records
- Access To Brekford Calibration Records Stalled in Salisbury, Morningside
- Public and Private Lobbyists Worked to Kill Speed Camera Reform
- Montgomery County Speed Camera Transforms Toyota into Dodge
- Montgomery County Boasts Error Rate "Under Ten Percent"
- Speed Camera Company Collects Dirt on Competitors
- Woman Gets 3 Tickets from DC Without Going There
- Legislature Raises Gas Tax
- Laurel, Hagerstown Circumvent Calibration Requirement
- Speed Camera Calibration Fails To Ensure Accuracy
- Speed Camera Programs Flout Sunshine Law
- Xerox Admits 5% Error Rate For Speed Camera Tickets
- Baltimore Cites Motionless Car For Speeding
- O'Malley Says Speed Camera Bounties Are Illegal
- Baltimore Ticketed Innocent Delivery Vehicle: Documents Prove Speed Camera Error
- Rockville Sees Huge Surge in Red Light Violations
- Trucking Company Challenges Accuracy of Baltimore Citations: Videos Prove Speed Camera Errors
- Speed Camera Salesman Caught Speeding AGAIN
- Riverdale Park Defends Forgery of Police Signatures
- High Court Rules Local Governments Above the Law
- Riverdale Park Allowed Civilians to Forge Police Approvals
- Baltimore Speed Camera Issues Ticket to the Dead
- Statewide Speed Cameras Now a $77Million Per Year Industry
- PG County Court Presumes All Defendants Guilty
- Town Releases Documents Proving Errors With Optotraffic Cameras
- Man arrested for asserting innocence in speed camera hearing
- Optotraffic Representative Caught Speeding
- Driver Uses Carchip to Challenge Optotraffic Camera
- Deceased Baltimore Cop Signs 2000 Citations
- Montgomery County Denies Right To Face Camera Operator In Court
- ACS Buys Steak Dinners For Lawmakers
- Baltimore City Issues Hundreds of Tickets in Error
- Baltimore Writes Speed Camera Revenues Into Budget Before Cameras Approved
- Camera Mistakenly Accuses Driver of 100mph Rampage
- Montgomery County Scamera Contract Includes Massive PR Campaign
- Optotraffic Investigates Possible Speed Camera Errors
- Speed Camera Legislation Attracts Lobbyists
- Sykesville Voters Overturn Speed Cameras in Referendum
- Traffic Engineering Techniques Out-perform Speed Cameras
- Transportation Planning Board Unveils Plan to Track and Tax Drivers