A speed camera reform bill sponsored by senator James Brochin has been approved by the Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee with amendments.
Senate Bill 207 would require speed camera images to "provide sufficient information to allow for the calculation of the speed of the motor vehicle during the interval between the two time-stamped images.". Many speed camera programs, including the Maryland SafeZones program, round off the timestamps to nearest second, making it impossible to compute speed and determine whether errors took place after the fact. Other speed camera programs (including those run by Optotraffic) round timestamps off to the nearest tenth second and then argue in court that citation images cannot be used as evidence of speed. This argument is sometimes accepted by some judges who have openly stated that they would not allow any defense challenging the accuracy of the device. Since SB207 specifically states that the purpose of images is to verify speed, it would hopefully prevent this type of denial of due process.
The bill also changes the wording of an existing ban on "bounty system" contracts. Current law forbid contractors who "operate" speed cameras from receiving a cut of each ticket issued, however this provision is being ignored by MOST local speed camera programs in the state, who simply do not use the word "operate" to describe the responsibilities of the camera contractor which owns, maintains, and substantially controls the equipment. Even Governor O'Malley recently acknowledged that this violated the intent of state law. SB207 clarifies the language to close this "loophole".
The legislation was prompted by revelations of abuses and
errors by speed cameras. This includes admissions that speed cameras deployed by camera contractor Xerox Corp has issued erroneous citations, evidence that large trucks were traveling only half the speed they were accused of by speed cameras, and that speeding tickets were issued to stationary vehicles. The equipment involved in these events produced errors even when all "manufacturer specified" calibration tests passed, demonstrating that existing requirements for testing of speed cameras under state law do NOT prove accuracy. The
same contractor runs programs for the SHA and Montgomery County, and the
same type of equipment which produced these errors in Baltimore City is currently deployed
in Baltimore County and Rockville.
The bill was amended before passing the committee to remove a new requirement that school zones cameras be placed within 500 feet of the grounds of a school. A new requirement that roads be painted with lines to facilitate the calculation of speed was also cut from the bill before the committee vote.
Unpaid private citizens came to a Feb 20 hearing to support Brochin's Bill, including a college professor, radar
expert, and a whistleblower from the SHA SafeZones Program, as well as a
representative from this site. Representatives from the speed camera
programs of several local governments including Montgomery County,
Prince George's County, and Forest Heights were paid with taxpayer
dollars to appear in opposition to the reform legislation.
The bill must still pass a vote in the senate, a committee hearing in the house, and pass the house in the same form in order to be enacted The House Environmental Matters committee is considering legislation of their own.
Read additional coverage on the Baltimore Sun
- ► 2016 (21)
- ► 2015 (39)
- ► 2014 (82)
- Maryland Legislature Votes To Raise Gas Tax
- PA Examines Speed Cameras, Looks to Maryland As Ex...
- Senate Neuters Speed Camera Reform Bill Provision
- Maryland House Approves Gas Tax Hike
- Baltmore City Calibration Certificates May be Inco...
- Baltimore Calls for "Media Restraints"
- Speed Camera Reform Clears Senate Committee
- Laurel, Hagerstown Circumvent Calibration Requirem...
- Gas Tax Hike Included In Govenor's Transportation ...
- House, Senate Committees Prepare to Rule on Speed ...
- Lawmaker Proposes SHA Ticket Refunds
- Ohio Court Rebukes Optotraffic
- Court Rules Baltimore County Contract Illegal
- House Committee to Examine Six Speed Camera Bills
- ▼ March 2013 (14)
- ► 2012 (66)
- ► 2011 (88)
- ► 2010 (69)
- ► 2009 (58)
Our Top Stories
- Rockville Falsely Accuses School Bus of Speeding
- Montgomery County Has Secret Speed Camera Committee -- Press and Critics Not Welcome
- Montgomery Speed Camera "OmBudsman" Won't Answer Questions
- Montgomery County Issues Erroneous Tickets
- College Park Cited Stationary Bus for Speeding
- Montgomery County ATEU Defends Culture of Secrecy
- How Two-Faced Triple-A Gave Maryland Speed Cameras
- "Secret" Baltimore Speed Camera Audit Found 10% Error Rate
- Speed Camera Reform Act Just a Big Fat Lie
- Court Rules Against Morningside on Public Records Access
- Speed Camera Company Celebrates "Bounty System" Loophole
- Montgomery County Steals Lanes for Expensive Bus Program
- Wicomico County Teachers Say Camera is Not Accurate
- Montgomery Council President Rice Racked Up Tickets
- Circuit Court Rules Innocence is a Defense, Rejects "Snitch" Requirement
- Baltimore Ends Camera Contract, Moves to Hides Records
- Montgomery Scamera Boss Lies About Red Light Camera "Warning Flashes"
- Montgomery County Camera Boss Blocks Public From Secret Meeting
- Salisbury Records Show Calibration Lapses, Sorry No Refunds!!
- Speed Camera Accuracy Questioned in Morningside
- Attorny General Gansler Depicted as "Reckless Passenger"
- Morningside Deployed Cameras Despite County Denial
- Morningside Admits Maintaining No Calibration Records, Doesn't Operate Own Cameras
- ACLU Documents Mass Tracking of Motorists By License Plate Scannrs
- Brekford Demands Tribute to See Calibration Records
- Access To Brekford Calibration Records Stalled in Salisbury, Morningside
- Public and Private Lobbyists Worked to Kill Speed Camera Reform
- Montgomery County Speed Camera Transforms Toyota into Dodge
- Montgomery County Boasts Error Rate "Under Ten Percent"
- Speed Camera Company Collects Dirt on Competitors
- Woman Gets 3 Tickets from DC Without Going There
- Legislature Raises Gas Tax
- Laurel, Hagerstown Circumvent Calibration Requirement
- Speed Camera Calibration Fails To Ensure Accuracy
- Speed Camera Programs Flout Sunshine Law
- Xerox Admits 5% Error Rate For Speed Camera Tickets
- Baltimore Cites Motionless Car For Speeding
- O'Malley Says Speed Camera Bounties Are Illegal
- Baltimore Ticketed Innocent Delivery Vehicle: Documents Prove Speed Camera Error
- Rockville Sees Huge Surge in Red Light Violations
- Trucking Company Challenges Accuracy of Baltimore Citations: Videos Prove Speed Camera Errors
- Speed Camera Salesman Caught Speeding AGAIN
- Riverdale Park Defends Forgery of Police Signatures
- High Court Rules Local Governments Above the Law
- Riverdale Park Allowed Civilians to Forge Police Approvals
- Baltimore Speed Camera Issues Ticket to the Dead
- Statewide Speed Cameras Now a $77Million Per Year Industry
- PG County Court Presumes All Defendants Guilty
- Town Releases Documents Proving Errors With Optotraffic Cameras
- Man arrested for asserting innocence in speed camera hearing
- Optotraffic Representative Caught Speeding
- Driver Uses Carchip to Challenge Optotraffic Camera
- Deceased Baltimore Cop Signs 2000 Citations
- Montgomery County Denies Right To Face Camera Operator In Court
- ACS Buys Steak Dinners For Lawmakers
- Baltimore City Issues Hundreds of Tickets in Error
- Baltimore Writes Speed Camera Revenues Into Budget Before Cameras Approved
- Camera Mistakenly Accuses Driver of 100mph Rampage
- Montgomery County Scamera Contract Includes Massive PR Campaign
- Optotraffic Investigates Possible Speed Camera Errors
- Speed Camera Legislation Attracts Lobbyists
- Sykesville Voters Overturn Speed Cameras in Referendum
- Traffic Engineering Techniques Out-perform Speed Cameras
- Transportation Planning Board Unveils Plan to Track and Tax Drivers