The Town of Morningside and the City of Salisbury have failed to produce annual calibration certificates and daily setup logs for their speed cameras in response to a Maryland Public Information Act Request within the 30 day period of time required by state law.
1) The annual calibration certificates for ALL speed monitoring systems used by Salisbury during any portion of 2011, 2012, or 2013. I am seeking both current AND expired certificates.
2) The daily setup/deployment logs for all speed cameras used in Salisbury on the following dates:
a. October 19, 2012
b. November 1, 2012
c. December3, 2012
d. January 3, 2013
e. February 1, 2013
3) The technical specifications of speed cameras used in Salisbury.
This was followed up with a certified mail receipt, which the city signed for.
Salisbury confirmed that the request was received, however after the 30 day period of time allowed by state law had elapsed, we did not receive the requested records. Instead, we were merely sent a forwarded email from Salisbury's contractor, Brekford Corporation, stating that they had been unable to collect the requested records. On July 22 the interim town administrator stated to us by email that he would 'follow up' with us withn a few days, and the assistant police chief stated by email that " I will forward what I received last week on Tuesday after review by my bosses". However as of July 27 (more than 50 days after the request) the requested calibration records still had not been received by us.
State law requires devices to be certified annually be an independent calibration lab, and requires the issued certificates to be "kept on file". State law also requires the "operator" of a speed monitoring system to fill out and sign a daily setup log. which is also required to be "kept on file". In most cases local governments assert that they, not the contractor, "operate" the devices in order to avoid a prohibition on paying contractors on the number of tickets issued.
We note that Salisbury maintains only a few speed camera sites, and as such the number of records requested is not actually that great. A 'technical specification' is typically simply a description of the device, included in marketing material or operating manuals.
At the same time, we filed a similar request with the city of Morningside on June 5, and also sent a certified mail copy of the request which the town clerk signed for on June 10th. This request was for the following:
1) The annual calibration certificates for ALL speed monitoring systems used by Morningside during any portion of 2011, 2012, or 2013. Please note that transportation article 21-809 requires annual calibration certificates for speed cameras to be “kept on file”. I am seeking both current AND expired certificates.
2) The daily setup/deployment logs for all speed cameras used in Morningside on Suitland Road (all locations and directions) on the following dates:
a. September 12, 2012
b. November 29, 2012
c. November 30, 2012
d. January 17, 2013
e. February 1, 2013
f. March 18, 2013
g. May 5, 2013
3) All correspondence (including letters, emails, and memos) exchanged between the Morningside Police and its speed camera contractor (Brekford) dated from 11/1/2012 through present, pertaining to ‘administrative void’ of speed monitoring system citations or requesting that speed monitoring system citations be voided or refunded.
The request for correspondence about 'administrative void' of citations was included because the Maryland Drivers Alliance had been contacted by a motorist who had received an "administrative void" letter. The motorist had intended to contest his ticket, but was issued the void letter included no explanation for the citation being voided. Morningside has not publicly released any information about citations having been voided, and it is unknown at this time whether this was only affecting the one citation or if it was part of a larger batch of tickets being voided. The motorist providing the information had found discrepancies with some of the information on the citations and also disputed the accuracy of the speed readings.
The Maryland Drivers Alliance attempted to follow up with the Town of Morningside by email about the requests, prior to the end of the 30 day time period for a response allowed by state law, on June 24, June 28, July 6. No response to any of our inquiries was responded to within the 30 day time limit of the MPIA. We attempted to contact the town again by email after the due date on July 11 and July 17th. No reply was received. On July 22, we called the town clerk who had signed the certified mail receipt and was told the request had been sent to the town attorney and that we would receive a response from him "within a few days". We copied the town attorney (who happens to work for Alexander and Cleaver, a firm which does lobbying for speed camera contractor Xerox Corp). Three days later the attorney confirmed he had our request, however no response either granting or denying our request was given and no records provided. More than 50 days after we sent Morningside our request (20 days longer than state law allows) and after numerous attempts by us to follow up with the request, no records have been provided.
The Maryland Public Information Act is state law, which requires local governments to respond to requests within 30 days of receipt. State law requires that public records must be made available to the requester at the earliest possible time, and within 30 days in any event, unless they fall into a limited number of legal categories for denied records. Both daily setup logs and annual calibration certificates have been released by other jurisdictions on other occasions, and the SHA publishes annual calibration certificates to their websites, so any argument that such records would not be disclosable or should require extensive legal examination to release is highly implausible. In any event, the 30 days allowed to respond to an MPIA request is intended to take into consideration the time for legal examination of a request.
Two other Brekford clients recently directed the contractor to refund speed camera citations issued by cameras with expired calibrations. Hagerstown ordered Brekford to void or refund over 700 citations, and Greenbelt ordered another 664 to be voided. A Washington County court had ruled that the 'annual' certificates issued for several cameras in Hagerstown violated state law by having expiration dates 13 months, rather than a year, after the date off issuance.
The Town of Morningside has had a particularly "interesting" history with photo enforcement. Town Councilwoman Regina Foster resigned her position in 2011 after being accused in a ticket fixing scandal in which it was alleged that she had improperly voided red light camera tickets issued to herself and others. Regina Foster was never charged, and was re-elected with only 77 votes (less than 4% of the town's population) in 2012, and is now back in office. Prior to re-election Ms Foster was quoted by the Gazette as saying “And I love the speed cameras [installed last year] and the great
opportunities their revenue provide to do things for the community.” .
In June of 2012 Morningside budgeted to replace falling property tax revenues with $642,000 in speed camera revenues. This would equate to about 8 citations per resident of the small town, which sits adjacent to I-495 and a major naval air facility. The town's TOTAL budget from all sources is about $2million.
Aside from this, in 2009 a former Morningside police chief was drummed out of office and plead guilty to stealing and then illegally selling a handgun. Another police chief resigned from Morningside earlier in 2013 amid disputes with the town.
- ► 2016 (21)
- ► 2015 (39)
- ► 2014 (82)
- Brekford Demands Tribute to See Calibration Record...
- Access To Brekford Calibration Records Stalled
- Tell Us What You Think
- Municipalities Budget For Cameras Fines
- ACLU Documents Mass Tracking of Motorists By Gover...
- Public and Private Lobbyists Worked to Kill Speed ...
- State to Impose Fines and Revoke Plates for Unpaid...
- Attorney Argues Damascus Camera Tickets Should be ...
- Greenbelt Says Brekford's Speed Cameras Certificat...
- Montgomery County Speed Camera Transforms Toyota i...
- ▼ July 2013 (10)
- ► 2012 (66)
- ► 2011 (88)
- ► 2010 (69)
- ► 2009 (58)
Our Top Stories
- Rockville Falsely Accuses School Bus of Speeding
- Montgomery County Has Secret Speed Camera Committee -- Press and Critics Not Welcome
- Montgomery Speed Camera "OmBudsman" Won't Answer Questions
- Montgomery County Issues Erroneous Tickets
- College Park Cited Stationary Bus for Speeding
- Montgomery County ATEU Defends Culture of Secrecy
- How Two-Faced Triple-A Gave Maryland Speed Cameras
- "Secret" Baltimore Speed Camera Audit Found 10% Error Rate
- Speed Camera Reform Act Just a Big Fat Lie
- Court Rules Against Morningside on Public Records Access
- Speed Camera Company Celebrates "Bounty System" Loophole
- Montgomery County Steals Lanes for Expensive Bus Program
- Wicomico County Teachers Say Camera is Not Accurate
- Montgomery Council President Rice Racked Up Tickets
- Circuit Court Rules Innocence is a Defense, Rejects "Snitch" Requirement
- Baltimore Ends Camera Contract, Moves to Hides Records
- Montgomery Scamera Boss Lies About Red Light Camera "Warning Flashes"
- Montgomery County Camera Boss Blocks Public From Secret Meeting
- Salisbury Records Show Calibration Lapses, Sorry No Refunds!!
- Speed Camera Accuracy Questioned in Morningside
- Attorny General Gansler Depicted as "Reckless Passenger"
- Morningside Deployed Cameras Despite County Denial
- Morningside Admits Maintaining No Calibration Records, Doesn't Operate Own Cameras
- ACLU Documents Mass Tracking of Motorists By License Plate Scannrs
- Brekford Demands Tribute to See Calibration Records
- Access To Brekford Calibration Records Stalled in Salisbury, Morningside
- Public and Private Lobbyists Worked to Kill Speed Camera Reform
- Montgomery County Speed Camera Transforms Toyota into Dodge
- Montgomery County Boasts Error Rate "Under Ten Percent"
- Speed Camera Company Collects Dirt on Competitors
- Woman Gets 3 Tickets from DC Without Going There
- Legislature Raises Gas Tax
- Laurel, Hagerstown Circumvent Calibration Requirement
- Speed Camera Calibration Fails To Ensure Accuracy
- Speed Camera Programs Flout Sunshine Law
- Xerox Admits 5% Error Rate For Speed Camera Tickets
- Baltimore Cites Motionless Car For Speeding
- O'Malley Says Speed Camera Bounties Are Illegal
- Baltimore Ticketed Innocent Delivery Vehicle: Documents Prove Speed Camera Error
- Rockville Sees Huge Surge in Red Light Violations
- Trucking Company Challenges Accuracy of Baltimore Citations: Videos Prove Speed Camera Errors
- Speed Camera Salesman Caught Speeding AGAIN
- Riverdale Park Defends Forgery of Police Signatures
- High Court Rules Local Governments Above the Law
- Riverdale Park Allowed Civilians to Forge Police Approvals
- Baltimore Speed Camera Issues Ticket to the Dead
- Statewide Speed Cameras Now a $77Million Per Year Industry
- PG County Court Presumes All Defendants Guilty
- Town Releases Documents Proving Errors With Optotraffic Cameras
- Man arrested for asserting innocence in speed camera hearing
- Optotraffic Representative Caught Speeding
- Driver Uses Carchip to Challenge Optotraffic Camera
- Deceased Baltimore Cop Signs 2000 Citations
- Montgomery County Denies Right To Face Camera Operator In Court
- ACS Buys Steak Dinners For Lawmakers
- Baltimore City Issues Hundreds of Tickets in Error
- Baltimore Writes Speed Camera Revenues Into Budget Before Cameras Approved
- Camera Mistakenly Accuses Driver of 100mph Rampage
- Montgomery County Scamera Contract Includes Massive PR Campaign
- Optotraffic Investigates Possible Speed Camera Errors
- Speed Camera Legislation Attracts Lobbyists
- Sykesville Voters Overturn Speed Cameras in Referendum
- Traffic Engineering Techniques Out-perform Speed Cameras
- Transportation Planning Board Unveils Plan to Track and Tax Drivers